Your payment went through, but this device could not restore your in-progress answers (this can happen on some phones after returning from the payment page). Answer the questions again below — it takes about 6 minutes and you will not be charged a second time.
How it works
Six steps of honest questions, then a transparent read-out. Nothing is guessed, and every number is traceable back to an answer you gave.
Pick destination & visa
The questions and the scoring change with the country and the route. A US visitor case is not weighed like a Canadian study permit.
Answer honestly
Work, finances, purpose, ties and history. Flattering answers only produce a flattering result, and officers see the real file.
See your profile strength
One overall band and eight category scores, each of which opens to show the reasoning behind it.
Find the loose ends
Contradictions between your funds, your dates, your leave and your stated purpose, flagged as identified concerns, never asserted as fact.
Read it as an officer might
Positives, concerns and the questions your file invites, framed around the published legal test for your route.
Get your improvement plan
High, medium and low priority actions: each one a problem, why it matters, how to fix it and the evidence that supports it.
What we analyse
Eight categories, weighted differently for every country and route, because the published legal tests are different. A US visitor application turns heavily on ties, because the law starts from a presumption you intend to stay. An Australian student application turns on whether the course makes sense for you, and since 2024 a later intention to seek residence is expressly not counted against you.
What this is not
It is not a government tool, it has no connection to any immigration system, and it does not simulate one. It does not produce an approval percentage, because no honest methodology supports one. It gives you a preparedness read-out and a list of things to fix.
{{ cat.blurb }}
Ready when you are.
Six minutes of honest answers. You can stop and come back. Your progress stays in this browser only, and you can delete it in one click.
{{ rBandSummary }}
{{ rTest }}
{{ rFraming }}
{{ adj.note }}
Base score from your answers: {{ rBaseScore }} out of 100.
This is a preparedness score, not a probability. It is deliberately not an estimated chance of approval. No honest methodology supports predicting an officer's decision. Rules reviewed {{ rReviewDate }} · engine {{ rEngineVersion }} · ruleset {{ rConfigVersion }}.
Category scores
Tap any category to see exactly which answers produced the number, and what would move it.
How an officer may view your profile
Framed around the published test for this route. An inference is an inference. Nothing here is a finding of fact.
- {{ p.text }}
No clear positives were identified from your answers yet. That usually means key parts of the profile still need to be built rather than presented.
- {{ c2.text }}
No significant concerns were identified from the answers you gave.
{{ q }}
- {{ m }}
Potential red flags
{{ fl.detail }}
Based only on what you told us. A document review can still surface things a questionnaire cannot see.
Everything above is a risk identified from your answers, not a risk confirmed. Only an officer, on your actual file, decides what matters.
Where your profile disagrees with itself
Officers cross-check the form against the documents. These are the points where the parts of your case pull in different directions.
{{ ci.note }}
Your figures, dates and stated purpose agree with each other. The next check is whether your documents agree with your answers. That needs a human reading the actual paperwork.
The refusals a profile like yours tends to attract
The section below maps your scores onto the grounds a refusal letter can name. This one is different: it is the pattern-level judgement that comes from handling these profiles: which grounds this shape of application tends to attract, and what actually answers each one. It is not a prediction about your case.
{{ lk.why }}
{{ lk.answer }}
Your answers do not match the profile shapes that typically attract a ties, funds or purpose refusal. That is a genuinely good position. It means the work left is presentation: making sure the file reads as clearly as it actually is.
The grounds a refusal letter can cite
{{ rGroundsIntro }}
{{ g.note }}
Each ground is shown against your own score in the category it maps to. This is how your profile currently sits against the named grounds, not a prediction that any of them would be cited.
Your application improvement plan
Ordered by what would change the assessment most. Every item is something you can do honestly. Nothing here involves creating documents, borrowing funds to inflate a balance, or presenting anything that is not true.
Documents you may need
Built from your country, your route and your own circumstances. Items marked essential are the ones this route effectively cannot do without. {{ rCountryNote }}
Requirements vary by applicant and change over time. Always follow the official checklist generated for your own application. See our full document checklist →
This is the part we build for you.
A strong 2–3 page cover letter setting out your profile, a letter of intent that argues the purpose of your visit properly, a ties declaration letter that names every tie against the document proving it, a refusal justification letter that answers a previous ground by ground, and clean declarations of funds, sponsorship and intent to return, written around your actual documents, consistent with every figure in your application. We cannot guarantee a decision. What we can do is make sure nothing in your file has to be guessed at.
Sources this assessment is based on
Official government sources only. Blogs, forums and other consultancies are not used as authority for eligibility or requirements.
{{ rDisclaimerCountry }}
{{ rDisclaimer }}
Your profile can be stronger. We can help.
This page reads what you told us. What it cannot do is read your actual bank statements, your employer letter, your refusal notes or your host's documents, and that is usually where applications are won or lost.
We cannot guarantee a visa decision, and we never will. Our work is to help you present a clearer, more complete and more credible application.
We read your real statements, letters and returns and tell you where they contradict each other or your application.
How your purpose, funding and ties are structured, evidenced and explained, before you submit.
Your refusal letter read line by line, and an honest view of what has actually changed since.
A truthful practice conversation built from your own profile, not memorised answers. More →